Information on Result #467693
There is no (66, 96, 521)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 79570 817646 002969 426999 140736 > 296
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (66, 97, 521)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction |