Information on Result #467733

There is no (81, 97, 16803)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 158471 225643 286069 172112 178876 > 297

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (81, 98, 16803)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction