Information on Result #467741

There is no (34, 98, 68)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 408984 463189 274797 386336 176550 > 298

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (34, 99, 68)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction