Information on Result #467838

There is no (35, 101, 69)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 2 585615 493983 917135 063187 373380 > 2101

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (35, 102, 69)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction