Information on Result #468002

There is no (91, 105, 110747)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 40 566518 678698 923108 552956 139708 > 2105

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (91, 106, 110747)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction