Information on Result #468093

There is no (66, 108, 278)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 347 467440 995566 609322 717574 821539 > 2108

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (66, 109, 278)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction