Information on Result #468141

There is no (89, 109, 8640)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 649 607958 489593 159384 334234 048313 > 2109

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (89, 110, 8640)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction