Information on Result #468346
There is no (69, 115, 270)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 43603 208728 584734 566928 997822 785152 > 2115
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (69, 116, 270)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |