Information on Result #468374

There is no (50, 116, 108)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 88725 384432 052223 394845 525431 159319 > 2116

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (50, 117, 108)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction