Information on Result #468412

There is no (51, 117, 111)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 173969 781581 116779 173614 935441 514992 > 2117

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (51, 118, 111)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction