Information on Result #468422

There is no (71, 117, 289)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 178294 368360 062114 701094 850833 725952 > 2117

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (71, 118, 289)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction