Information on Result #468497

There is no (67, 119, 216)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 678947 366901 347239 505964 379359 130600 > 2119

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (67, 120, 216)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction