Information on Result #468534

There is no (66, 120, 201)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 1 380467 695286 679121 128817 427478 382560 > 2120

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (66, 121, 201)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction