Information on Result #468549

There is no (96, 120, 5399)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 1 331262 021354 596428 550472 257154 824614 > 2120

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (96, 121, 5399)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction