Information on Result #468693

There is no (68, 124, 205)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 21 884672 053247 252460 638771 284264 032540 > 2124

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (68, 125, 205)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction