Information on Result #468735
There is no (69, 125, 211)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 43 581483 002290 035402 028625 484446 374320 > 2125
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (69, 126, 211)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |