Information on Result #468805

There is no (47, 127, 93)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 212 558085 851220 542917 815361 122655 412010 > 2127

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (47, 128, 93)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction