Information on Result #468808

There is no (53, 127, 111)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 188 766600 973005 953113 567129 028112 884532 > 2127

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (53, 128, 111)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction