Information on Result #468848

There is no (50, 128, 101)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 411 534950 840358 035948 646972 553642 115944 > 2128

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (50, 129, 101)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction