Information on Result #468871

There is no (96, 128, 1718)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 341 653707 376838 473753 983566 770881 719787 > 2128

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (96, 129, 1718)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction