Information on Result #468913

There is no (97, 129, 1795)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 682 763732 304805 798642 519347 717896 936208 > 2129

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (97, 130, 1795)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction