Information on Result #468992

There is no (89, 131, 625)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 2738 926141 289912 646017 499788 943439 787376 > 2131

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (89, 132, 625)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction