Information on Result #469016
There is no (52, 132, 105)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 6259 974901 400618 419276 134109 995571 688823 > 2132
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (52, 133, 105)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction |