Information on Result #469016

There is no (52, 132, 105)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 6259 974901 400618 419276 134109 995571 688823 > 2132

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (52, 133, 105)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction