Information on Result #469038

There is no (96, 132, 1192)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 5455 779449 544982 051873 635220 239065 869870 > 2132

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (96, 133, 1192)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction