Information on Result #469072

There is no (79, 133, 295)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 11667 363438 980950 719226 599564 640294 688568 > 2133

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (79, 134, 295)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction