Information on Result #469079

There is no (93, 133, 805)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 10903 101463 551456 943298 872575 495567 813886 > 2133

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (93, 134, 805)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction