Information on Result #469128

There is no (106, 134, 4580)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 21817 634142 330863 938697 785883 834016 362904 > 2134

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (106, 135, 4580)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction