Information on Result #469133

There is no (116, 134, 125809)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 21779 414807 944633 827958 436427 139832 374116 > 2134

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (116, 135, 125809)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction