Information on Result #469135

There is no (120, 134, 1956549)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 21778 105811 768977 693263 842127 878794 725784 > 2134

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (120, 135, 1956549)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction