Information on Result #469163

There is no (89, 135, 519)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 45028 613536 967511 000009 585942 712548 230976 > 2135

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (89, 136, 519)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction