Information on Result #469169
There is no (101, 135, 1740)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 43946 449429 365659 547920 475209 020972 251948 > 2135
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (101, 136, 1740)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction |