Information on Result #469325

There is no (61, 139, 132)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 808520 052622 853459 402492 415433 383418 439328 > 2139

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (61, 140, 132)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction