Information on Result #469397

There is no (116, 140, 17177)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 1 394232 567211 733433 953295 965274 848378 343852 > 2140

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (116, 141, 17177)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction