Information on Result #469411

There is no (53, 141, 104)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 3 025933 436449 958662 041693 874205 362315 526696 > 2141

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (53, 142, 104)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction