Information on Result #469416

There is no (63, 141, 138)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 2 972226 293779 671711 309456 232088 676206 656624 > 2141

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (63, 142, 138)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction