Information on Result #469488

There is no (116, 142, 10986)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 5 576769 593209 744484 728076 393511 117410 038584 > 2142

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (116, 143, 10986)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction