Information on Result #469506

There is no (61, 143, 129)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 13 960318 347603 729141 771972 692762 361845 140320 > 2143

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (61, 144, 129)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction