Information on Result #469575

There is no (106, 144, 1489)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 22 509432 848035 619605 136206 042496 617241 699816 > 2144

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (106, 145, 1489)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction