Information on Result #469599

There is no (61, 145, 127)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 49 123013 586333 442884 960506 559080 861261 804883 > 2145

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (61, 146, 127)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction