Information on Result #469600

There is no (63, 145, 135)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 55 418270 644563 650619 048086 958984 841865 020800 > 2145

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (63, 146, 135)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction