Information on Result #469614

There is no (91, 145, 414)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 46 098890 549592 010609 005580 522103 883490 121222 > 2145

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (91, 146, 414)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction