Information on Result #469616

There is no (95, 145, 532)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 46 438385 613897 034796 941297 859674 761680 871488 > 2145

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (95, 146, 532)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction