Information on Result #469706

There is no (85, 147, 289)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 178 752641 892488 146918 884044 991595 047942 144000 > 2147

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (85, 148, 289)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction