Information on Result #469708

There is no (89, 147, 351)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 181 019640 501062 102565 773532 681025 884652 488236 > 2147

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (89, 148, 351)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction