Information on Result #469740

There is no (58, 148, 116)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 447 516097 334481 700218 435817 054553 462912 536212 > 2148

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (58, 149, 116)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction