Information on Result #469792

There is no (65, 149, 139)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 803 264795 008541 376702 203373 774489 083844 339484 > 2149

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (65, 150, 139)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction