Information on Result #469983

There is no (63, 153, 129)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 13484 970834 868176 610844 124972 348344 136154 195392 > 2153

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (63, 154, 129)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction