Information on Result #470132

There is no (64, 156, 130)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 94033 892321 455952 842285 349188 198839 063335 116992 > 2156

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (64, 157, 130)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction