Information on Result #470258

There is no (116, 158, 1567)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 367468 376431 328547 990083 508842 496295 249580 458436 > 2158

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (116, 159, 1567)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction