Information on Result #470298

There is no (95, 159, 356)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 764591 544801 481039 509153 652372 822806 943096 827447 > 2159

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (95, 160, 356)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction